Please may we have some clarification on the matter of confirming States – this one in Colombia and also for the future?

This is Us.
This again is a tricky one, as before we have a conflict of hierarchy. (J) is as equally convinced that (R) is Enlightened, as (P) that he is not – yet! Tread carefully!

In this case it is imperative that all parties are happy. We need (N)’s wisdom here.
What should have happened is that (P) should have told (J) but not (J) in this case, as there is no point.

We must not have two people confirming a State as there will be discrepancies. No matter how neutral a Channeller feels, and how long they have been doing their job, there will always be times when there is mis-information for whatever reason. This is human nature and has to be factorised in at all times. Channellers are not infallible.

There is no need to be concerned because We are here to put things right if need be. That is one of the reasons that We insist on the Meditation after Enlightenment.